Difference Between Squirrel Cage Rotor and Wound Rotor
Induction motors are among the most widely used electric machines in industries due to their robustness, simplicity, and reliability. The performance and application of an induction motor largely depend on its rotor construction. There are two main types of rotors used in induction motors: the Squirrel Cage Rotor and the Wound Rotor. Understanding the differences between these two helps in selecting the right motor for specific industrial applications.
1. Construction
A Squirrel Cage Rotor consists of laminated steel cores with aluminum or copper bars permanently short-circuited by end rings. It resembles a rotating “cage” structure. In contrast, a Wound Rotor (or Slip Ring Rotor) has a three-phase winding on its core connected to external resistors through slip rings and brushes. This allows control over the rotor circuit resistance.
2. Starting and Speed Control
The Squirrel Cage Rotor offers simple operation but limited starting torque and no external speed control. On the other hand, the Wound Rotor allows higher starting torque and smooth speed control by adjusting external resistance, making it ideal for heavy-duty applications requiring variable speed.
3. Maintenance and Cost
Squirrel Cage Rotors are almost maintenance-free since they have no brushes or slip rings. They are more economical and reliable for continuous operation. Wound Rotors require regular maintenance due to brushes and slip rings, increasing operational costs and downtime.
4. Applications
Squirrel Cage Induction Motors are widely used in fans, pumps, compressors, and conveyors where constant speed is sufficient. Wound Rotor Motors are typically used in cranes, elevators, hoists, and mills where controlled acceleration and variable speed are needed.
5. Comparison Table
| Parameter | Squirrel Cage Rotor | Wound Rotor |
|---|---|---|
| Construction | Aluminum or copper bars short-circuited by end rings | Three-phase winding connected to external resistors via slip rings |
| Starting Torque | Low to moderate | High (adjustable with external resistance) |
| Speed Control | Not possible | Possible by varying rotor resistance |
| Maintenance | Low (no brushes or slip rings) | High (due to brushes and slip rings) |
| Cost | Less expensive | More expensive |
| Efficiency | Higher due to low losses | Lower due to resistance losses |
| Applications | Fans, pumps, compressors, conveyors | Cranes, hoists, elevators, rolling mills |
Conclusion
In summary, both rotor types serve specific industrial needs. The Squirrel Cage Rotor is best for applications requiring simplicity, low cost, and constant speed operation. The Wound Rotor, while more complex and costly, provides superior control over starting torque and speed, making it ideal for heavy-duty and variable-load conditions.




BR 31821
VN 16361
US 7545
CN 3753
IQ 3427
AR 3084
MX 2895
MY 2854
