MFRS 15 vs MPERS 34: Recognition in Property Development and Construction - THK Management Advisory Sdn Bhd

MFRS 15 vs MPERS 34: Recognition in Property Development and Construction

The recognition of revenue in property development and construction industries has long been a critical accounting consideration. Two key frameworks—MPERS Section 34 and MFRS 15—offer distinct approaches, reflecting their unique underlying principles and objectives. Understanding the differences between these standards is crucial for entities navigating compliance and accurate financial reporting.

MPERS Section 34: Project-Specific Revenue Recognition

Focus: MPERS Section 34, designed for entities adopting the Malaysian Private Entities Reporting Standard (MPERS), emphasizes project-specific revenue recognition methods. This framework suits small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with simpler reporting needs.
Recognition Basis: Revenue is recognized based on the progress of the construction or development project. This ensures that revenue aligns closely with the project’s completion stage.
Measurement: The percentage of completion (POC) method is applied to measure revenue. This involves estimating the stage of completion using inputs such as costs incurred to date versus total estimated costs.
Balance Sheet Presentation: Project-related balances are presented as “amount due from customers” (asset) or “amount due to customers” (liability), depending on the net position of project costs and billings.

MFRS 15: Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Key Principle: MFRS 15, applicable to public interest entities and entities requiring compliance with Malaysian Financial Reporting Standards (MFRS), revolves around the principle of performance obligations. The standard focuses on recognizing revenue when an entity satisfies performance obligations by transferring control of goods or services to the customer.
Recognition Basis: Revenue is recognized at the point when control of the asset or service is transferred to the customer, rather than solely based on project progress. This approach emphasizes the customer’s ability to direct the use and obtain the benefits of the transferred asset.
Measurement: Performance obligations may involve recognizing revenue over time if certain criteria are met (e.g., the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits as the entity performs). Otherwise, revenue is recognized at a point in time when control is transferred.
Balance Sheet Presentation: MFRS 15 introduces the concepts of “contract assets” and “contract liabilities,” replacing traditional terms such as “amount due from customers.” These classifications are determined by the net position of revenue recognized and amounts billed.

Conclusion

Choosing between MPERS Section 34 and MFRS 15 depends on the nature of the entity and its reporting requirements. SMEs may find MPERS Section 34’s straightforward approach suitable for their needs, while larger or public interest entities must adopt MFRS 15’s more detailed and principle-based framework.

Visit Us

Wisma THK, 41, Jalan Molek 1/8, Taman Molek, 81100 Johor Bahru
Wisma KTP, 53 Jalan Molek 1/8, Taman Molek, 81100 Johor Bahru

THK (Secretarial, Bookkeeping, Payroll, Advisory)
A licensed secretarial firm in Johor Bahru providing fast reliable incorporation, secretarial services, corporate compliance services, outsourcing bookkeeping, and payroll services to clients

KTP (Audit, Tax, Advisory)
An approved audit firm and licensed tax firm operating under the KTP group based in Johor Bahru providing audit, tax planning, advisory and compliance services to clients

KTP Lifestyle
An internal community for our colleagues on work and leisure.

KTP Career
An external job community on vacancies in Johor Bahru for interns, graduates & experienced candidates.

Instagram https://bit.ly/3u2PxHg
Facebook http://bit.ly/3rPxz9o

#Thk
#KTP

全名 *
邮件 *
联络电话 *
公司名字
公司地址
标题 *
我们如何可以帮助您？ *